I do not know what to say.

The description (and the drawing - page 60, fig. 16a) of
etrusca given by Lugetti & Tongiorgi in RICERCHE SUL GENERE ALOPECOSA SIMON
(ARANEAE-LY COSIDAE) 1969 matches almost perfectly with my spider, except for a few small details - I do not see the narrowing of the median band in the posterior part of the prosoma nor the oval shape of the same band in the cephalic area, but I notice very well in my spider the interrupted rings in the ventral part of the femurs described by the Italians, but I don't know if this characteristic is also common to
farinosa.
The habitat also fits well.

Against
etrusca there is the distribution on Italian soil. On araneae.it I read that
etrusca was found only in central Italy and Piedmont (northwestern Italy). But the lack in southern Italy does not worry me too much, as they say: those who don't seek, don't find.
I also have no reason to compare with the size of
etrusca, which I do not find anywhere (only prosomial), so I don't know if my spider, if
etrusca, is young or female.
Finally, the
farinosa specimens in the wiki look too much like my spider, and this is my main source of doubt.
At this point, I am unable to move beyond
Alopecosa sp.
Raf